Wednesday, January 27, 2010

What does the "iSlate" mean for Hollywood?


The Hollywood Reporter has an interesting article on what the new Apple tablet has in store for Hollywood. What has been rumored to be named "the iSlate," Apple will announce details of the product soon (less than an hour)! It is expected to be tight competition with Amazon Kindle, an electronic reader, and will [of course] be fully loaded with other multimedia options.

According to Whitney, Hollywood isn't taking the iSlate seriously:

"The whole game is changing, and this is just one play in the game," says Jared Tobman, executive vp digital and production at Reveille. "Apple has a great playbook for how the new game will be played, but I don't think one device or one company presents the salvation or the end of content distribution as we know it."

Whitney should realize that this quote doesn't at all represent all of Hollywood. This quote, in fact, is quite naive. To say that one device or company can present the end of distribution may be true, but does Tobman recognize Apple's presence? It has already chance the distribution of media. iTunes began as a device for the music industry but has developed into distribution for both television and film (Hollywood and independent media).

The article also acknowledges Apple's presence with consumers, stating the tablet "...is the most buzzed-about because of the company's high marks with consumer experience and because of the iPhone's popularity."

This is, of course, another important aspect. Apple's popularity with consumers has that much more affect on the changes of content distribution with multimedia. Apple has developed an incredible amount of devotion from eager consumers who will demand their media when they want it.

"The TV business model already is under enormous pressure as studios and networks look for ways to shave costs from scripted content. There are only so many ad dollars to go around, which is why devices that support and encourage paid models are alluring. That includes smartphones like those from Apple and Google."

Here, again, we see another inclination toward the gray areas of distribution. Along with new technology comes increased costs to share distribution in every format. When one new technology is introduced, such as the iSlate, distributors must gather the funding - and with this economy is no easy task - to supply consumers with what they want. We, as consumers, demand what we want. Apple gives us this opportunity and distribution companies in all forms of media must comply.

Monday, January 25, 2010

My Oscar Nominations Wish List

The Academy Award nominations will be announced in about one week on Tuesday, February 2 at 5:30am PST. For now, I have compiled my own list of the major categories. Check them out and let me know what your nominations are! The bolded ones are my picks!

The Academy Awards will air Sunday, March 7, 2010.




Best Picture

  • (500) Days of Summer
  • An Education
  • A Single Man
    • This film will certainly not receive the statue and it may not even receive the nomination it rightfully deserves. When I think Best Picture, I think Best Everything, and this film has it all. The performances are incredible and the adaptation from script to screen is extremely gratifying. What Isherwood completes in writing Tom Ford enhances in both the script and the visuals of the film. The range of emotions in the film is simple yet it holds such an incredible tone of beauty throughout its entirety.
  • Avatar
  • District 9
  • Inglorious Basterds
  • Los abrazos rotos
  • Nine
  • Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire
  • Up in the Air

Actor in a Leading Role

  • Colin Firth -- A Single Man
    • You can bet he won't win it. Jeff Bridges will certainly take this statue home (I still have yet to see him in Crazy Heart), but I firmly believe Firth's turn as a single, lonely, recovering man is incredible. Firth accomplishes so much emotion without even opening his mouth, and when he does - to only mutter a simple sentence - it flows confidently and desperately.
  • Daniel Day-Lewis -- Nine
  • George Clooney -- Up in the Air
  • Jeff Bridges -- Crazy Heart
  • Willem Dafoe - Antichrist

Actress in a Leading Role

  • Carey Mulligan -- An Education
    • Sandra Bullock has been taking home the awards lately. It seems to be that Bullock and Streep have been going head to head (and tying for the Critic's Choice Award). But the real star in this category is Mulligan. There is such confident in her character, but Mulligan places the ignorance and naivety of a teenager right alongside it. Mulligan has truly made a breakthrough with this performance but, unfortunately, she will not receive proper recognition. Sandra Bullock, if you even get a nomination... >.<
  • Charlotte Gainsbourg -- Antichrist
  • Emily Blunt -- The Young Victoria
  • Gabourey “Gabby” Sidibe -- Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire
  • Meryl Streep -- Julia & Julia

Actor in a Supporting Role

  • Christian McKay -- Me and Orson Welles
  • Christoph Waltz -- Inglorious Basterds
    • He's been sweeping the awards and he deserves them all entirely. Waltz's turn as a Nazi killer in Tarantino's masterpiece is haunting and hilarious. There is so much joy watching this character unfold his cringing words with a smirk on his face. Waltz will get it, don't you fret.
  • Matt Damon -- Invictus
  • Stanley Tucci -- The Lovely Bones

Actress in a Supporting Role

  • Anna Kendrick -- Up in the Air
  • Julianne Moore -- A Single Man
  • Mo’Nique -- Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire
    • As I've said before, Mo'Nique is really the only woman in this category who has blown me away. Her transition from comedy to drama is impeccable - she embraced this role more than almost any role I've seen on film (however, nothing can beat Marion Cotillard in La Vie En Rose). As I said in my review of the film in November: Mo' Nique will nab the Oscar.
  • Penelope Cruz -- Nine
  • Vera Farmiga -- Up in the Air

Directing

  • James Cameron -- Avatar
    • Avatar, despite its incredibly lame and unoriginal script, is an original masterpiece of filmmaking. It's the future, and James Cameron carried it.
  • Jason Reitman -- Up in the Air
  • Lars von Trier - Antichrist
  • Lee Daniels - Precious: Based on the story Push by Sapphire
    • I know I'm stretching it here, putting six nominees, but I would like to say that, out of respect for Mr. Daniels, we need more black men in cinema. And we need more gay men in cinema. And he did an outstanding job with Precious.
  • Quentin Tarantino -- Inglorious Basterds
  • Tom Ford – A Single Man

Writing (Original Screenplay)

  • (500) Days of Summer -- Scott Neustadter, Michael H. Weber
  • Antichrist – Lars von Trier
  • A Serious Man – Ethan Coen, Joel Coen
  • The Hurt Locker -- Mark Boal
  • Inglorious Basterds -- Quentin Tarantino
    • He'll get it.

Writing (Adapted Screenplay)

  • An Education -- Nick Hornby
  • District 9 -- Neill Blomkamp, Terri Tachell
  • Julia & Julia -- Nora Ephron
  • Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire --
  • Up in the Air -- Jason Reitman, Sheldon Turner
    • They'll get it.

Foreign Language Film

  • Los abrazos rotos
    • Out of the films that have been nominated for past awards, this is the only one I have seen. The only other one I'm really looking forward to is The White Ribbon.

Music (Score)

  • Avatar -- James Horner
  • A Single Man --Abel Korzeniowski
    • Screw you, Up. This score is impeccable!
  • Up – Michael Giacchino
  • Where the While Things Are -- Carter Burwell, Karen Orzolek

Music (Song)

  • Avatar -- James Horner, Simon Franglen, Kuk Harrel (“I See You”)
  • Nine -- Maury Yeston (“Cinema Italiano”)
  • Where the Wild Things Are -- Karen Orzolek, Nick Zinner (“All Is Love”)

Cinematography

  • Avatar
  • Inglorious Basterds
  • Nine
  • A Single Man

Makeup

  • Avatar
  • District 9
  • Fantastic Mr. Fox
  • Inglorious Basterds
  • Nine

Costume Design

  • Inglorious Basterds
  • Nine
  • A Single Man
  • The Young Victoria

Art Direction

  • Avatar
  • Fantastic Mr. Fox
  • Inglorious Basterds
  • A Single Man
  • The Young Victoria

Visual Effects

  • Avatar (duh)

Animated Feature Film

  • Coraline
  • Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs
  • Fantastic Mr. Fox
    • This film is stunning with its animation. It's one-of-a-kind yet Up keeps taking this category, when it is absolutely nothing new for Pixar.
  • The Princess and the Frog
  • Up

Saturday, January 16, 2010

A Single Man is One-Of-A-Kind


There are times when a film is so anticipated that it can be a disappointment. When Little Children was receiving its Oscar buzz in 2006 I fled to my nearest bookstore and purchased the book. To my delight, I loved it. When I finally saw the film, however, I hated it. This also brings about the problem of adaptation where the book is often always better than the film. For A Single Man I did the same – I quickly read the novel by Christopher Isherwood and fell in love with it. The film adaptation directed by Tom Ford, I am happy to report, is just as attractive and touching – if not more so than the novel.

Deborah Young with The Hollywood Reporter says: “Most of the action takes place over the course of a single day in Los Angeles in the early '60s, when being gay was socially disapproved. The film brushes ever so lightly on the issue of discrimination…” This distinction is important for the film and filmgoers. Many audiences may be surprised and disappointed by the gay subject matter of the film (thanks to the Weinstein Company’s heterosexually overwrought trailer), but one must note that the homosexuality is almost unimportant. There is no preaching of the acceptance of homosexuality, but instead a certain modernism exists. In 1962 homosexuality was much different – and almost unapparent – compared to today. Like the novel, homosexuality is not an issue. The script depicts it as just there.

It seems the reviews do not have any singularity to them. As I shift from one review (from the New York Times) to another (Roger Ebert) they continually pick on the visual richness of the film. indieWIRE fully agrees, stating: “…viewers who are totally cool with the gay themes still may be turned off by an 105 minute hybrid of moving painting and perfume commercial.” This is an ignorant exaggeration. It seems - since last saw the film - that nearly half was made up of intense close-ups of various images: a beautiful, blooming flower; a Latino man exhaling his cigarette smoke; a pair of eyes staring into the camera. If this is agitating to an audience member, I would simply tell them that they do not understand the film. The depiction of beauty is the message of the film: something so little, like one’s eyes looking into yours, can be so effective and significant. George travels through his day silent, quiet, and perceptive. He is an observer and discoverer of the beauty in his life, no matter how small.

What each review collectively respects are the performances of the film, specifically Colin Firth, whom many of you only recognize as love interests in Bridget Jones’ Diary and Mamma Mia. From Manohla Darvis of NY Times: “…the director knows how to exploit his actor’s reserve to terrific effect, as when he sets the camera in front of Mr. Firth’s face in one critical scene and just lets the machine record the tremors of emotion cracking the facade.” Indeed, Firth is exceptional as George. He goes about his day with such reserve. When you look into his face you almost know what he’s thinking, but not quite. When he interacts with his student, Mr. Potter (Nicholas Hoult), George’s face comes alive. Julianne Moore is incredibly playful and dramatic with her role as George’s intimate best friend, and Matthew Goode’s role as George’s dead lover, Jim, brightens each flashback with a love one can only wish to have (and for those who have it, may not appreciate it as much as the camera).

“Fashion is very fleeting. Film lasts forever. And I think that a film should challenge you. I think a film should make you think. And if I can get the audience to leave the theater and think: ‘Wow. I need to pay more attention to my day…” then I think the film will have meant something.” And it means so much more than I believed it would. There has only been one “film” to churn my mind like A Single Man. I say “film” because it is the HBO miniseries Angels in America. Also set in the past, it raises so many questions for its audience through incredibly writing, acting, and cinematography. I have seen it so much that I know it word for word. Although I am familiar with each character’s words, I discover something new each time I watch: the symbolism, the setting, the tone, etc. A Single Man holds this magnificence as well.

Isherwood’s novel contains such immense beauty in every word, and Ford has brought these into a witty, handsome script. But Ford has also translated these words into images and created a masterpiece. When a film like this comes along it is impossible to become obsessed; there is such attention to detail that your eyes and mind wish to gain an understanding for it all. I can only hope this film will receive its appropriate Academy Award statues – Best Picture, Director, Actor, Cinematography – but I have a feeling it will only receive it in nominations.

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Golden Globe Awards: MY PICKS!


The Golden Globes are in exactly one week, so I've narrowed down my picks for the awards. It's somewhat disappointing - two years ago I was so blown away by Marion Cotillard in La Vie En Rose and also by Tilda Swinton in Michael Clayton. Last year, Amy Adams, Phillip Seymour Hoffman, and (of course) Meryl Streep all blew me away in Doubt.

Slumdog Millionaire was such a surprise of a film last year. This year I haven't had anything truly blow me away to the same degree - granted, I still haven't seen Avatar (I know, I know.. I will be seeing it tomorrow) - but it's mostly a good ol' drama that gets me. This year I've been very surprised by many films, but none of them have pleased so much as they have these past two years.

The awards will be presented Sunday, January 17 on NBC. The Globes will be hosted this year by Ricky Gervais (so it will be funny and offensive)!


Check out my list HERE: http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474977987107